Why Should I Choose a Wavefront Guided Procedure?
In order to correct your vision during LASIK, an excimer laser is used to reshape the front surface of your cornea. The leading edge technology that is enhancing our ability to perform that reshaping process more accurately than ever before is called Custom Wavefront guided LASIK. We’d like to explain why Wavefront guidance is such an exciting advance over previous methods.
You’re familiar with the high quality of TV images obtainable using High Definition technology compared to standard TV systems. The program content is the same but the image clarity is worlds apart. That’s the type of difference that we can observe with Wavefront guidance compared to conventional LASIK surgery.
In the past, the laser was only capable of creating shapes on the cornea that were symmetrical, like farsightedness, nearsightedness, and astigmatism. These are the aberrations that are typically corrected by wearing glasses. However, once you factor out these simple optical distortions, there remain additional complex shapes in the optical system that keep your eyes from seeing perfectly. These complexities are called higher order aberrations, and include such things as: coma, trefoil, tetrafoil, and spherical aberration to name just a few. These higher order aberrations, if not corrected during your LASIK procedure, can still leave you with imperfect optics and occasionally glare or halo side effects.
These higher order aberrations are completely unique to your particular optical system and can now be precisely measured using a wavefront measuring device that creates an optical “fingerprint” of your visual system. This wavefront analyzer is considered to be nearly 100 times more accurate than measuring your vision with lenses, as has been the standard in the past.
Most importantly, this wavefront data can be sent to the excimer laser to create an extremely complex and accurate wavefront-guided treatment, effectively correcting ALL of the aberrations that are present in your visual system. This high-resolution, 3-D, custom wavefront treatment allows us to provide you with your optimal best personal vision that often exceeds that of glasses, contacts, and older Lasik surgery. Wavefront guidance also provides a higher quality of vision, consistently superior night vision, and measurably reduces the chance for needing a laser enhancement compared to older conventional non-Wavefront guided treatments. By analogy, it is like comparing high definition TV to standard TV – Wavefront guidance delivers superior clarity and superior quality.
Why would any patient knowingly choose to have a non-Wavefront guided treatment when Wavefront is scientifically proven to be superior? Or, Why would a surgeon even offer a procedure that they know is inferior, less precise and has more side effects? Those are questions you might just want to ask other laser centers when you are weighing their medical ethics and professionalism.
At Will Vision, by using the combination of IntraLase and wavefront customization, we only offer the best, safest, and most accurate advanced technology for your optimal visual outcome. Customized Wavefront guided Intralase -- Why settle for anything less?
You also need to know that all Wavefront Guided procedures are not created equal. The ability to measure and deliver wavefront guided excimer laser treatments accurately is complicated. Not all laser manufacturers are able to deliver the best wavefront technology. The following table details those critical differences.
| VISX Star S4 IR | WaveLight Allegretto | Bausch and Lomb | LadarVision 4000 | Nidek EC 5000 |
Customized
Wavefront Treatments | Yes - Widest FDA approval of any
laser system worldwide | Limited | Limited | Limited | No |
Wavefront
Resolution | Fourier algorithm offers highest
resolution of wavefront error | Zernicke algorithm interpolates
and smoothes data artificially | Zernicke algorithm interpolates
and smoothes data artificially | Zernicke algorithm interpolates
and smoothes data artificially | Zernicke algorithm interpolates
and smoothes data artificially |
Active
3-D Eye Tracking | Yes | No - 2-D only | No - 2-D only | No - 2-D only | No - 2-D only |
Iris
Registration | Yes - Centers and aligns
treatment independent of pupil center migration and eye cyclorotation | No - Manual marking only - less
accurate and subjective | No - Manual marking only - less
accurate and subjective | No - Manual marking only - less
accurate and subjective | No - Manual marking only - less
accurate and subjective |
Compensates
for pupil migration during physiologic pupil dilation | Yes - centers and aligns
treatment independent of pupil migration | No | No | No - Pharmacologic pupil
dilation required for tracking creates potential for centering error | No |
Requires
peri-operative use of eye drops that impair healing | No | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Size
of Laser Beam | Small and large spot for rapid
treatment and optimized to reduce thermal injury to tissue | Small spot only but very high
speed reduces tissue dehydration during laser photoablation | Small spot only - slows
treatment and allows for tissue dehydration during laser photoablation | Small spot only - slows
treatment and allows for tissue dehydration during laser photoablation | Scanning slit |
Thermal
Damage to Cornea | Variable spot scanning reduces
thermal effects | Higher speed and excellent beam
characteristics may reduce thermal load to tissue | High speed and small spot can be
prone to thermal and drying effects | High speed and small Gaussian
spot prone to thermal and drying effects | Scanning slit creates heat that
damages tissue |
Physician
choice | Largest market share in the US
and growing rapidly (VISX invented laser vision correction) | Limited physician acceptance to
date | Limited physician acceptance to
date | Shrinking physician acceptance
and numerous post market complaints at FDA (see FDA MAUDE database) LV6000 is
currently recalled by the FDA | Shrinking physician acceptance
due to aging platform |
Safety
in conservation of corneal tissue | Conservative leaving good
residual for strength | Conservative leaving good
residual for strength | Aggressive system that is often
tissue "hungry" | Aggressive system that is often
tissue "hungry" for custom | Conservative leaving good
residual for strength |
Enhancement
Rate | Low - Typically less than 5% | Low - Typically less than 5% | Insufficient Data Available for
Comparison | Many centers report high rates
of retreatments from overcorrection | Higher reported rates due to
aging platform |
